Highrise Design has started lab-testing on various bolted joints to determine the optimal remedy against unfavorable corrosion of aluminium structures in offshore & marine applications. A first test piece has recently started a 1.500 hrs salt spray test to provide further insights in best available solutions.
A common perception is that Aluminium is a non-corrosive material. But actually, the contrary is true: aluminium is extremely corrosive. But its specific corrosion-process will form a thin protective layer of aluminium oxides, shielding the material from further oxygen access. With that protective layer in place, the corrosion process of aluminium normally comes to an early halt.
However, under certain circumstances this ideal situation gets hampered: a mechanism known as galvanic or bimetallic corrosion can cause sustained corrosion of aluminium. Galvanic corrosion may occur when two dissimilar metals are in contact with another while an electrolyte is covering the connecting area. The electro-potential difference between the two different metals is a driving force for an accelerated corrosion attack. If aluminium is the more anodic of the two metals in contact, this process is dissolving the aluminium into the electrolyte. In this way aluminium may corrode far more rapidly and to a much bigger extent than in normal atmospheric conditions. Especially in seaside, maritime or offshore applications, where sodium chloride (sea salt) containing water can cover the metal connections, an ‘ideal’ galvanic cell is created. This can possibly have considerable impact on structural integrity.
Bolted joints in Aluminium structures
Aluminium structures often contain bolted joints. These joints need to be carefully designed to avoid galvanic corrosion between the aluminium structure and the metal bolts. Selecting proper materials for these bolted connections is however not easy: various solutions all come with their pro’s and con’s. A simple way forward would be to avoid the use of different metals in a joint by using aluminium bolts. This would definitely resolve the problematic dissimilarity of metals in the connections. But aluminium bolts are not nearly as strong as steel bolts, making this solution quite unfavourable in terms of efficiency in space and costs.
Using (carbon) steel bolts is possible, but only when separating the aluminium and the steel bolts, using washers and bushes of inert materials. The disadvantage of these elements (next to costs and space-requirement) is that these need to endure challenging circumstances in lifetime. Most inert materials are prone to aging: deterioration resulting from UV-radiation and damage inflicted by icing conditions. In practise these materials often decay early, possibly resulting in loose bolt connections.
The most practical solution over last years has been the use of stainless steel bolts (A4 or A5 quality) directly connected on the bare aluminium. The shielding layers of oxides on both aluminium and stainless steel have a low potential difference. This results in a relatively mild form of galvanic corrosion of the aluminium material, mostly around the bolt heads. Although it can be visually disturbing, in most cases this corrosion remains minor, not impairing the integrity of the joint. However, in certain circumstances, even this ‘milder’ galvanic corrosion process can still cause unacceptable corrosion. Especially in more aggressive, acidulous environments the galvanic corrosion needs to be better prevented to ensure proper lifetime expectancy of the aluminium structure.